Showing posts with label democrat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrat. Show all posts

Friday, May 4, 2007

Jerry Steele says - the dhimmitude of the defeatocRats is gonna leave them pissin into the wind as a political party


May 04, 2007

50 Democratic Senators Sign "Hissy-Fit" Letter Condemning David Broder For Daring To Criticize Harry Reid

—Ace

An ill wind chilling dissent blows across the American political landscape.

I guess all 50 of the Senate Democrats (did Tim Johnson actually sign this?) are supporters of Ari Fleisher's oft-quoted-out-of-context statement that in these troubling times, public figures must "watch what they say."

Veteran political columnist David Broder set off a firestorm recently when he called Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid an "embarrassment'' for declaring the Iraq War "lost.''

From the assault subsequently directed at Broder -- from other journalists, political operatives, left-wing bloggers and even the entire 50-member Senate Democratic Caucus -- you'd have thought Broder had had an intimate encounter with an intern.

...

In a letter to The Washington Post that had the unmistakable whiff of a powder room manifesto, otherwise known as a hissy fit -- as opposed to a "bed-wetting tantrum,'' as Paul Begala described Broder's column -- the senators asserted that their leader is a "good listener,'' who has an "amazing ability to synthesize views and bring people together,'' and who also demonstrates a "mastery of procedure.''

It is perhaps admirable, and certainly reassuring to Reid, that his fellow senators came to his defense. But this kind of overreaction to a columnist is rare, if not unprecedented, and betrays a disturbing hostility to legitimate criticism.

...

Outrage has become such a predictable response to any difference of opinion that it's lost its heat. When everything is outrageous, nothing is.

...

Part of this devolution in discourse has been brought about, no doubt, by the volcanic explosion of the blogosphere, which has democratized free speech in a way that is not always positive or pretty. Everybody can type, but not everyone can write. Everyone has an opinion, but not everyone comes equipped with the same skills and experience.

The disinhibiting effect of anonymity, meanwhile, has unleashed something dark in the human spirit that seems to have infected the broader culture. It isn't enough to say that Broder is all wet; instead he's "foaming at the mouth,'' a "gasbag" and a "venomous'' bloviator, borrowing again from Begala.

The absence of fairness and respectful dissension -- and the decline of civility wrought by our nation's unhinged narcissism -- now there's something worthy of outrage.

Via the New Editor, which notes the vagina-fearing Iranian Foreign Minister walked out of a meeting with Condi Rice because a female violinist there was dressed "too revealingly."

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Show of hands - Dhims have no clue about the ongoing global war on terror

Presidential Campaign Kook Watch

It’s not too hard to distinguish the kooks; they eagerly reveal themselves: Video: Is there a global war on terror?


Democrat Defeatism and the meaning of the word retreat


Iraq: The Democrat-led Congress will hand President Bush a bill that requires troop withdrawals to begin this fall. Bush has said he’ll veto it. Good. Now it’s time for the rest of the GOP to denounce this charade.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said Bush is in a “state of denial” over the surge in Iraq. In fact, it’s the Democrats who are in denial.

The $124 billion pork-filled bill was scheduled for a vote late Wednesday. Whenever it’s passed, the bill they present Bush will be vetoed. Though it’s possible they’ll be able to override the veto, it’s not likely. So what we have left is pure politics.

“On Iraq, the American people want a new direction, and we are providing it,” said Sen. Patty Murray, the Washington Democrat and one of the lead congressional negotiators on the legislation.

She’s right — they do have a new direction. It’s called reverse. Or in military parlance, retreat. But what’s truly amazing is that the Democrats can’t understand just how bad they look right now.

More from INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY

Interesting Poll results the MSM isn't quick to publicize


Some interesting polling results in recent days. For example:

According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll, 61% of Americans oppose “denying the funding needed to send any additional U.S. troops to Iraq,” and opposition is up from 58% in February. (3/23-25, 2007).

A Bloomberg poll reveals 61% of Americans believe withholding funding for the war is a bad idea, while only 28% believe it is a good idea (3/3-11, 2007).

A recent Public Opinion Strategies (POS) poll found that 56% of registered voters favor fully funding the war in Iraq, with more voters strongly favoring funding (40%) than totally opposing it (38%); (3/25-27, 2007).

POS found also that a majority of voters (54%) oppose the Democrats imposing a reduction in troops below the level military commanders requested (3/25-27, 2007).

A separate POS poll finds 57% of voters support staying in Iraq until the job is finished and “the Iraqi government can maintain control and provide security for its people.” And 59% of voters say pulling out of Iraq immediately would do more to harm America’s reputation in the world than staying until order is restored (35%); (2/5-7, 2007).

A Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll show 69% of American voters trust military commanders more than members of Congress (18%) to decide when United States troops should leave Iraq. This includes 52% of Democrats, 69% of Independents and 88% of Republicans (3/27-28, 2007).

According to a recent Pew Research survey, only 17% of Americans want an immediate withdrawal of troops (4/18-22, 2007). That same poll found a plurality of adults (45%) believe a terrorist attack against the United States is more likely if we withdraw our troops from Iraq while the “country remains unstable”

Should a date for withdrawal be set, 70% of American believe it is likely that “insurgents will increase their attacks in Iraq” starting on that day. This is supported by 85% of Republicans, 71% of Independents and 60% of Democrats. (FOX News/Opinion Dynamics, 4/17-18, 2007).

An LA Times/Bloomberg polls reveals that 50% of Americans say setting a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq “hurts” the troops, while only 27% believe it “helps” the troops (4/5-9, 2007).

I’m sure our friend Glenn Greenwald over at Salon will be reporting all this to his readers any minute now.

Source: The Corner Blog